by Courtney Lyles, PhD
As a health services researcher, I have been interested in
ways to engage individuals with their health or healthcare management –
particularly ways that fit into their everyday lives outside of the doctor’s
office or hospital. That’s why the buzz
about health information technology seems so promising to me: the potential to
provide practical and customizable information/feedback at the right
moment. In addition, the financial
incentives are starting to align to promote health technologies. With the rollout of federal healthcare reform
in the past few years, it has become clear that technology will be a fundamental,
not tangential, part of healthcare in the near future.
Yet when I think about patients receiving care in safety net systems like SFGH,
I see both opportunities and challenges during this transition to
technology-enhanced healthcare.
Opportunities:
First, there is strong evidence that technology access has
become widespread in the US across income and education levels. 85% of American adults are internet
users. Among lower income adults, 77% are Internet users including 32% who have
accessed the Internet for free outside of their home, school, or work in the
past year.
Second, there is a lot of evidence to suggest that all
individuals regardless of healthcare setting are interested in accessing their
personal electronic healthcare records. About
three-fourths of patients say that they would like to go online to view their
medical record, and 60% want to communicate with their provider electronically. This is very similar to the levels of
interest we reported among our patient population at SFGH last year.
Challenges:
While the overall digital divide is rapidly shrinking, the
age gap remains a problem, especially given that many of our health technology
solutions are geared toward helping those with healthcare need: that is, older adults with
chronic illness. For example, my 69
year-old parents, who can use email and Facebook with ease, have an extremely
challenging time managing a plethora of usernames and passwords across multiple
accounts to review their bank and credit card information. The issue of age is amplified further by
income, with the largest disparities in technology use among older, low-income populations. Pulling a slide directly from that Pew Internet Research Project report (below), the disparities by age among low-income adults are striking.
Among low-income adults, only 25% aged
65+ had broadband Internet access or owned a smartphone, compared to 92% of
young low-income adults.
Second, we have not developed most health technologies in
multiple languages. In San Francisco in
2010, 45% of the population spoke a language other than English at home, suggesting we have a lot of linguistic
access to manage in the coming years. This discussion about language is, however, largely absent in the health information technology community.
These thoughts are just a few of the many opportunities and
challenges that lie ahead of us as we transform healthcare. I would love to hear your thoughts about the most important health technology topics that await us -- chime in using the comments box below or tweet me at @CourtneyRLyles.
You have tackled some important limitations to health technology. We are trying to get telecoms interested in using what we have already - the ubiquitous smartphone and rapid tests that have been around since the 80s. See http://www.medstartr.com/projects/437-smart-tsh
ReplyDelete