By Courtney Lyles, PhD
My main area of research over the past few years has focused
on getting diverse patient groups to engage in accessing their medical record
information online, through websites called online patient portals that are
linked to electronic health record systems in hospitals/clinics. Portals
typically involve allowing patients access to viewing their test results, visit
summaries, and sometimes emailing with providers. Because most healthcare
systems (with the exception of places like Kaiser) have only just recently
created these portal websites as a part of the Meaningful Use certification
process, there is a huge need for research studying their use and
effectiveness.
This post includes my thoughts about what we know and don’t
know from the research to date, especially in light of two recent systematic
reviews on 1) the effect of portals
on outcomes and 2) how patients with chronic disease and
their providers view using an online portal. (Apologies in advance that it is a very
research-specific post!)
·
Whites, women,
individuals younger than 65 years old, and those with higher education use
portals the most. This finding is
consistent across virtually every study and every healthcare system – think it is very well-established that there are large socio-demographic
differences in use. I think the more
important issues to highlight are: 1) across patient populations – including here at SFGH –
the interest level is high for accessing information online and communicating
with providers electronically, and 2) racial/ethnic differences in portal use
persist even when adjusting for everyday Internet use. Therefore, we have to
look beyond interest and access as the sole explanatory factors to be able to
figure out how to engage diverse groups in signing up and
logging in.
·
89% of
the portal studies were non-experimental and none were randomized controlled
trials (RCT). There is a need for more methodological rigor when studying
online patient portals. But it makes sense that no one published an RCT – the gold standard of effectiveness
evidence – about portals in the past 5 years: these websites are being
implemented as a part of standard care, and no system is willing to delay
implementation to be able to design and implement an RCT when there are
billions of financial incentives on the line.
However, there are many quasi-experimental
designs that can inform our understanding about the link between portals
and health and healthcare outcomes; we need to go beyond cross-sectional
assessments.
·
There are
many ways in which we can improve the exposure and outcome measurement for
these studies. We should start to
think of portal use as a set of various health behaviors rather than “any vs.
no” use. Some healthcare coordination
tasks like making appointments may be very distinct from logging on to email a
provider about medication side effects (and may require different skill sets to complete). Similarly,
since portals are linked to EHRs, let’s ensure that we choose clinical and/or
utilization measures from the medical record that are conceptually linked to
use of specific features of the portal.
For example, we have recently published on use of the online refill function in
relation to statin adherence.
·
“A recurring theme in
the literature is the inability of patients to understand medical terminology
presented in the patient portal and not being knowledgeable about their own
condition.” This is a direct
quote from the second review article, and it cannot be overstated enough in my
opinion. We are moving forward rapidly
to expand implementation of online patient portals, but there is very little to
no work to ensure that patients can actually use the information provided on
these sites. This is even more true in a
setting like SFGH, in which many of our patients face language and literacy
barriers. We need to employ new design
strategies to address usability upfront.
As researchers, clinicians, or healthcare administrators,
everyone in the healthcare setting will be shifting the standard of care to use
portal websites to communicate with patients in the coming years. Let’s all work together to design and
implement studies that will help us be able to do this most effectively and
with all of patients who are interested in accessing their information online.
Hi guys,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for this wonderful article really!
If someone want to know more about that patient portal I think this is the right place for you!
An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers
ReplyDeleteMengobati Perut Kembung
Cara Obati Pneumonia
Obat Untuk Penyakit Tipes
Hello! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.
ReplyDeleteCara Mengobati Penyakit Ginjal Akut